Twin Tension Rope Systems: The New Standard in Rope Rescue Operations

Jake Gillanders
May 14
4 min read

We're taking a deep dive into rope rescue systems. Specifically, we'll be exploring why Twin Tension Rope Systems (TTRS) have largely replaced the traditional Dedicated Main, Dedicated Belay (DMDB) approach in modern rescue operations. Whether you're a seasoned technical rescue technician or just starting to build your rope rescue skills, understanding these systems is critical for safe and effective rescue operations. We'll cover the key differences between these systems, why the industry has shifted to TTRS, and what this means for your team's training and equipment needs.

As always, these articles are designed to provide an introduction to the material or a refresher of knowledge you already have and don't replace real-life training. If you're interested in learning more about rope rescue, we've listed our upcoming rescue courses after the article, so make sure you take a look at those before you go!

Did you know you can get First Due in your inbox every month?

The Evolution of Rope Rescue Systems

For decades, the Dedicated Main, Dedicated Belay (DMDB) system was the gold standard in rope rescue operations. This approach assigned distinct roles to each rope: one rope served as the main line bearing the load, while the second rope functioned solely as a safety backup—remaining slack until needed in an emergency. While this system served the rescue community well, comprehensive testing and field experience have revealed limitations, particularly regarding force management and transition control.

Enter Twin Tension Rope Systems (TTRS), which represent a significant advancement in rope rescue methodology. Rather than having one active and one passive rope, TTRS keeps both ropes under tension throughout the operation. This seemingly simple change delivers profound improvements in safety, control, and efficiency.

Why Twin Tension Rope Systems Have Become the Industry Standard

Force Management

In traditional DMDB systems, a main line failure could result in shock loading the belay line—potentially generating forces exceeding 12 kN (about 2,700 lbs). These dynamic forces threatened both equipment and rescuers.

TTRS addresses this fundamental issue through force-limiting principles. By maintaining tension on both lines, the system:

Caps maximum forces between 6-12 kN
Prevents uncontrolled movement during transitions
Distributes load across both systems
Reduces potential shock loading

Testing has demonstrated that properly configured TTRS setups consistently maintain forces within safer operating ranges, even during sudden load transfers.

Enhanced Control During Critical Transitions

Edge transitions represent one of the most dangerous phases of any rope rescue operation. In traditional systems, the transition from horizontal to vertical (or vice versa) created moments where control was compromised as the load shifted between systems.

With both ropes under tension in TTRS, operators maintain constant control through these critical transition points. The dual tension approach provides:

Smoother movement across edges
Immediate response to load shifts
Reduced slack in the system
Better communication between team members

Improved Human Factor Management

Human error remains the leading cause of incidents in technical rescue. TTRS incorporates specific protocols to mitigate these risks:

Edge transition briefings ensure all team members understand their roles
"Dry run" practice before committing to the operation
Simplified communication with standardized commands
Rope tailing techniques providing manual backup with minimal grip force (0.1-0.2 kN)

These procedures create multiple layers of protection against the most unpredictable element in any rescue system—human performance under stress.

Technical Requirements for Effective TTRS

For a system to qualify as a proper Twin Tension Rope System, it must meet several key criteria:

Dual Capability: Both ropes must function effectively as either main lines or backups.
Force Limitation: The system must cap forces between 6-12 kN, preventing excessive loading while maintaining control.
Backup Functionality: Must reliably catch a 1-meter drop of a 200 kg mass, limit arrest forces to 12 kN or less, and stop within 1 meter.
System Strength: Minimum breaking strength of 20+ kN for all components.
Rope Resilience: Maintain at least 80% rope strength after dynamic testing.]

Practical Considerations for Implementation

Transitioning from DMDB to TTRS requires changes in equipment, training, and operational procedures. Here are key considerations for departments making this shift:

Equipment Selection

Not all descent control devices (DCDs) are suitable for TTRS operations. Look for devices that:

Provide consistent force limitation
Function reliably under variable loads
Allow for smooth transitions between raising and lowering
Incorporate self-braking capabilities

Modern devices like the Petzl I'D, CMC MPD, and similar equipment have been designed with these requirements in mind.

Training Adjustments

Implementing TTRS requires retraining personnel who are accustomed to traditional systems. Focus on:

Proper tensioning techniques for both ropes
Communication protocols specific to dual tension operations
Edge transition procedures
Rope tailing methods that provide effective manual backup

Team Coordination

TTRS operations demand excellent coordination between team members. Every operation should include:

Clear assignment of roles
Pre-operation briefings
Dry runs of critical maneuvers
Explicit communication of load transfers

In this image, a technical rescuer demonstrates rope ascending technique using mechanical ascenders. Wearing proper PPE including a helmet and gloves, he maintains an efficient climbing position with the rope in front of his body while using a handled ascender with an etrier (foot loop) system. Below, safety personnel observe the operation, highlighting the importance of training and supervision during rope rescue skill development.

Remember:

Both ropes in a Twin Tension Rope System must be capable of catching the full load at any moment. This dual-capability approach dramatically improves safety during edge transitions and eliminates dangerous shock loading that occurs with traditional systems. Always practice tension management techniques with your team before deploying TTRS in the field.

Making the Transition to TTRS

Fire departments and rescue teams transitioning to TTRS should consider a phased approach:

Assessment: Evaluate current equipment and identify gaps
Training: Provide comprehensive training before field implementation
Supervised Practice: Conduct operations under controlled conditions
Full Implementation: Roll out the system across all operations

While the transition requires investment in training and potentially new equipment, the safety and efficiency benefits make TTRS well worth the effort.

Conclusion

Twin Tension Rope Systems represent a significant advancement in rope rescue methodology. By maintaining tension on both ropes throughout operations, TTRS provides greater control, reduces potential forces, and creates multiple layers of protection against both equipment failure and human error.

As the industry standard, TTRS offers rescue personnel a safer, more efficient approach to technical rope operations. Understanding and implementing these systems should be a priority for any department conducting rope rescue operations.

The evolution from DMDB to TTRS demonstrates how our field continues to advance through careful analysis, testing, and innovation. By embracing these improved methods, we ensure the highest level of safety for both rescuers and those we serve.